Wyniki wyszukiwania

Autor	Julian Krzyżanowski
Tytuł	The Evaluation of Implementation of Agricultural Sustainable Development Policy in the European Union
Title	The Evaluation of Implementation of Agricultural Sustainable Development Policy in the European Union
Słowa kluczowe	agriculture, European Union, „greening”, EIP
Key words	agriculture, European Union, „greening”, EIP
Abstrakt	Author tries to evaluate two elements of implementation of agricultural sustainable development policy in the European Union. Those elements are: “greening” and European innovation partnership. Greening is carried out by: crop diversification, maintenance of permanent grassland (PG), maintenance of ecological focus areas (EFA). Diversification of crops was carried out for three fourth of areas of arable lands in the EU. Diversification prevents soil erosion. Share of PG in the overall area of agricultural land in the EU is 29 %. The highest indicator is at present in the United Kingdom (90%), and the lowest in Cyprus, Malta, Denmark and Finland. From the set of actions maintaining the pro-environmental areas (EFA), the most popular were: setting aside (27 member states), and the least popular – afforestation (only 11 countries). When it comes to EFA area, the biggest share was the area for legume plants. New pro-environmental instrument is European Innovation Partnership for productive and sustainable agriculture. There has already been some results of this action in the EU countries.
Abstract	Author tries to evaluate two elements of implementation of agricultural sustainable development policy in the European Union. Those elements are: “greening” and European innovation partnership. Greening is carried out by: crop diversification, maintenance of permanent grassland (PG), maintenance of ecological focus areas (EFA). Diversification of crops was carried out for three fourth of areas of arable lands in the EU. Diversification prevents soil erosion. Share of PG in the overall area of agricultural land in the EU is 29 %. The highest indicator is at present in the United Kingdom (90%), and the lowest in Cyprus, Malta, Denmark and Finland. From the set of actions maintaining the pro-environmental areas (EFA), the most popular were: setting aside (27 member states), and the least popular – afforestation (only 11 countries). When it comes to EFA area, the biggest share was the area for legume plants. New pro-environmental instrument is European Innovation Partnership for productive and sustainable agriculture. There has already been some results of this action in the EU countries.
Cytowanie	Krzyżanowski J. (2018) The Evaluation of Implementation of Agricultural Sustainable Development Policy in the European Union.Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie - Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, t. 18(33), z. 2: 175-182
HTML	wersja html
Pełny tekst	PRS_2018_T18(33)_n2_s175.pdf

Autor	Julian Krzyżanowski
Tytuł	Dywersyfikacja upraw jako element „zazielenienia” w krajach Unii Europejskiej – czy to właściwe rozwiązanie?
Title	Crop diversification as an element of “greening” system in the European Union countries – is it the right solution?
Słowa kluczowe	dywersyfikacja upraw, Unia Europejska, wspólna polityka rolna, „zazielenienie”
Key words	crop diversification, European Union, Common Agricultural Policy, “greening”
Abstrakt	Autor zajmuje się problematyką dywersyfikacji upraw w krajach Unii Europejskiej. Wprowadzanie kilku rodzajów roślin jest częścią „zazielenienia” – systemu praktyk korzystnego dla środowiska i klimatu, obowiązkowego w obecnej perspektywie finansowej. Mimo konieczności stosowania dywersyfikacji na 75% powierzchni gruntów ornych, zobowiązanie to nie ma wpływu zarówno na alokację ziemi pod różne przeznaczenia, jak i na całkowity potencjał produkcji. Oznacza to, że rolnicy do tej pory samoistnie stosowali dywersyfikację. Uważa się, że poprawia ona ochronę gleby, ale według części ekonomistów środki przeznaczone na różnicowanie upraw mogłyby być lepiej wykorzystane. Należy bowiem sądzić, że środki na dywersyfikację są głównie elementem legitymizacji płatności bezpośrednich.
Abstract	Author tackles the problems of crop diversification in the EU countries. Introduction of different plants is the part of “greening”, a system of practices beneficial for environment and climate that is obligatory in the current financial perspective. Despite the necessity to diversify on 75% of arable land, this obligation has no impact on allocation of land to different crops, as well as on total production potential. It means that so far farmers diversified their crops spontaneously. It is believed that sowing different crops improves protection of soil, however according to some economists subsidies for crop diversification could be utilized in a better way. It can be assumed that diversification funds help to legitimize direct payments.
Cytowanie	Krzyżanowski J. (2018) Dywersyfikacja upraw jako element „zazielenienia” w krajach Unii Europejskiej – czy to właściwe rozwiązanie?.Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW - Ekonomika i Organizacja Gospodarki Żywnościowej, nr 123: 91-100
HTML	wersja html
Pełny tekst	EIOGZ_2018_n123_s91.pdf